THS ComMedia

This Blog has been specifically created for Mr. MacArthur's ComMedia Class at Tolland High School for the Spring Semester, 2006. We will be following the big stories of the next few months and how they're covered (or not covered) in the media (MsM and Alt!).

Name:
Location: Tolland, Connecticut, United States

A child of the 60's, graduate of Tolland High School, the University of Connecticut, and Wesleyan University, ready to begin his 34th year teaching -- all at Tolland High.

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

I Hate Progress!

But you already know that. For example, I love the old-fashioned voting machines that we have here in Connecticut. Apparently they go back to the Roosevelt (Franklin, not Theodore) era. Push the lever down to vote for your candidate. When you're done, pull the lever back, and you've voted. Elegant in its simplicity.

What I don't trust is these here new-fangled eelectronic votin' machines. What's so bad about 'em? Why, I'll tell ya. Any seventh grader worth his salt will be able to steal an election, that's what.
The latest dispute occurred several weeks ago after it was discovered at a test in Utah that someone with a reasonable knowledge of computer code could gain access to and tamper with the system software on a popular brand of voting machine manufactured by Diebold Election Systems.
Oh? you say? That's right, oh!
In California, David Jefferson, a computer scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory who consults with the state on its elections, said he was "stunned when he found out" about the vulnerability identified in the Utah test and agreed with the "frequently expressed opinion that this is the worst vulnerability that we have ever seen."
But surely nobody would want to interfere with an honest election, is that what you're thinking? Well, maybe a terrorist might. Or. . .
The 2002 Election NH "phone jamming" case revolves around the hiring by the New Hampshire Republican Party of the Virginia-based telemarketing firm GOP Marketplace. Republican operative Allen Raymond, who was president of the firm at the time, then "subcontracted the deed" to Mylo Enterprises Inc., a Pocatello, Idaho, phone bank shop.

Prosecutors allege that 'GOP Marketplace' "was paid to make repeated hang-up phone calls to overwhelm the phone banks in New Hampshire and prevent them from getting Democratic voters to the polls" on Election Day, November 5, 2002. Six phone lines that were being run by Democratic "coordinated campaign offices," as well as phones in the offices of the Manchester firefighters union -- which was also doing a get-out-the-vote campaign that morning -- were jammed by 800 computer-generated hang up calls that tied up the lines for 1 1/2 hours.

Voters' rights were violated as the "computer-generated calls went to lines set up for voters who needed rides to the polls in Manchester, Nashua, Rochester and Claremont." The calls were "stopped after then-Republican State Committee Chairman John Dowd ordered a halt because of concerns about their legality."

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'll actually agree with you here Mac....voting...youre just picking a candadite...it doesnt require a large amount of technology...pull a lever and you're good...nice and easy nothing new to learn...plus its obviously more secure and we wont have as many rigged elections.
Patrick Gallagher

11:24 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would push a button, why can't we push buttons?

Myles

6:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Duct Tape Incident

About 2 years ago, when we were first getting electronic voting machines in Maryland, one of our reporters was summoned to a news conference. Diebold officials were showing how their machines would be protected against hackers. You know what they showed her? A precicely placed piece of DUCT TAPE!

Obviously, that's a concern. But I also practically laughed at the reporter. Here's why (and a lesson for your future reporters). As any of your computer savvy students know, good *electronic* tampering will leave no physical evidence of changes. The reporter didn't realize this. Reporters need to know a little bit about everything, especially in this increasingly electronic world.

BTW, our electronic voting machines, which will be used again in this election cycle, do not have receipts. There is no physical evidence (paper trail) of your vote. A "recount" consists of asking the machine to repeat the vote count. There is no way to audit the machine. There were attempts in our last session of the general assembly to force the Diebold to put a paper trail on their machines. It failed.

Just some thoughts from a former student! :)

Chris Berinato
berinator@hotmail.com

1:25 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home