The Death Penalty for Moussaoui. . .
is looking less and less likely.
The problem is, he didn't actually do anything. He might have. He was trying to learn to fly planes. But he was in custody on September 11, 2001.
He can get the death penalty, though, if the prosecution can prove that if he had not withheld information, the plot would have been uncovered and all those lives saved. That never would have been that easy. It got a lot harder thanks to Carla Martin.
And today it got even less likely.
And get this: he was a witness for the prosecution! Sheesh!
The problem is, he didn't actually do anything. He might have. He was trying to learn to fly planes. But he was in custody on September 11, 2001.
He can get the death penalty, though, if the prosecution can prove that if he had not withheld information, the plot would have been uncovered and all those lives saved. That never would have been that easy. It got a lot harder thanks to Carla Martin.
And today it got even less likely.
The F.B.I. agent who arrested and interrogated Zacarias Moussaoui just weeks before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks told a jury on Monday how he had tried repeatedly to get his superiors in Washington to help confirm his certainty that Mr. Moussaoui was involved in an imminent terrorist airline hijacking plot.
But, said the agent, Harry Samit, he was regularly thwarted by senior bureau officials whose obstructionism he later described to Justice Department investigators as "criminally negligent" and who were, he believed, motivated principally by a need to protect their careers.
Mr. Samit's testimony added a wealth of detail to the notion that officials at the Federal Bureau of Investigation played down, ignored and purposely mischaracterized the increasingly dire warnings from field agents in the Minneapolis office that they had a terrorist on their hands in Mr. Moussaoui.
"I accused the people in F.B.I. headquarters of criminal negligence" in an interview after Sept. 11, Mr. Samit acknowledged under intense questioning by Edward B. MacMahon Jr., Mr. Moussaoui's chief court-appointed lawyer.
And get this: he was a witness for the prosecution! Sheesh!
3 Comments:
Well, this definitely is a new turning point in the Moussaoui case. I, for one, never thought he would admit this openly to being a part of the terrorist attacks. I am a bit confused however, to why he has all of a sudden released all this information that he has kept hidden for many years. Is he finally just realizing what life in prison could be like for him? Or is he trying to die in some form of glory? Or maybe he is playing reverse psychology on everyone?
Jeni
It could be just as simple as telling everyone what they want to hear to kill him. You put him in jail for the rest of his life, he becomes a martyr, you kill him, he becomes a martyr. You lock him in a cell, he becomes a martyr, you shoot him in the head, he becomes a martyr.
No matter what comes out of this case, the middle eastern propaganda is going to put their own spin on it.
Get a guy to blow up a school bus for a political statement is one thing, when you have a bunch of radicals in the name of "Allah," its going to be tough to punish anyone for a crime.
Myles
PS. Jeni is incredibly awesome.
This all pretty much fits together. If stops denying it, then he will get to die instead of life in prison, as well as die more gloriously than if he was still saying that he had no involvement. It seems like he is going to start to use the size of this case to help get his message across. Which is not very good for the war on terror. If he starts openly stating why he did this and then immediately gets killed, then the radicals everywhere will be even more enraged, and more apt to do something horrible. But then if he does not start to do so and we kill him just because we think that it might have helped then the radicals will be more enraged and more apt to do something horrible. This pretty much is a lose-lose for America and this war.
Aïcha
Post a Comment
<< Home